Saturday, May 30, 2009

Night At The Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smtihsonian

Director: Shawn Levy

Writers: Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon


Ben Stiller

Amy Adams

Robin Williams

Owen Wilson

Hank Azaria

Bill Hader


Night at the Museum was a fun film that delivered comedy fit for children and adults. NATM: Battle of the Smithsonian delivers a bunch of cheap jokes, poorly developed characters and a very forced relationship between Larry Daley (Stiller) and Amelia Earhart (Adams).


The second film is based on the characters from the first film being moved into storage. Larry Daley has gone on to greener pastures thanks to a few cool inventions and no longer has time for his magical friends. He goes to Washington after finding out the monkey took the tablet with him. Daley spends a day searching for a way into deep storage and finds it by taking the ID badge of a security guard.


By the time he makes it to deep storage all of the items are coming to life. We meet Gen. Custer (Bill Hader), all talk and light on follow through, and Amelia Earhart, a fast talking “independent” woman who immediately falls for Larry.


The film's villain is Kamunrah (Azaria), the younger brother of Akmenrah from the first film. Kamunrah has waited centuries for his opportunity to avenge the way he was treated by his parents. He gathers a predictable group of sub-villains from storage, men like Napoleon and Capone who would never have followed him in real life. Azaria is entertaining (as always) as the younger brother with an inferiority complex.


The worst part of the film is the “relationship” between Larry and Amelia. It is like watching middle-school fanfic brought to life. Everyone who sees them comments on what a cute couple they are and how they should be together. Amelia waffles back and forth from independent to needing a man. The writers really missed the mark on this and unfortunately this storyline is a large part of the film.


The film will entertain the kids but as an adult I found it boring in many places. Save your money and just watch the original.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Star Trek - Major Spoiler Alerts

Let me begin by saying I am a Trekkie/Trekker to the core and that I have had "issues" with this incarnation since I saw the first preview. There is no way I could have watched this film without finding fault with something. That being said this film is actually enjoyable.

My "issues"
The whole badly plotted fanfic approach - the whole gang is at the academy together in spite of the differences in their ages (which are redone), the Spock/Uhura relationship (Spock's age is approximately 28 in this - Vulcan's only get it on every seven years you know), Sulu and
Chekov already being assigned to the Enterprise; Captain Pike and Kirk being on the Enterprise at the same time; Spock's mother being killed....the list goes on and on and on and on.

Thank goodness for alternate universes (another sign of a poorly plotted fanfic). This is the explanation given for all the wrong moves in this film.

The good part is that it actually works. The story pulls you in. The fast pace moves the story along and you are never bored. The effects are great.

So...if you are a trekkie/trekker see it twice. Once to gripe about all the things that are wrong (and there are many) and once to enjoy.

See again? Have to
DVD? You bet